日本語版

caffeine

compound / compound-caffeine

カフェイン

Caffeine is a bitter methylxanthine with diverse biological actions.

Photographs (captions in Japanese)

A microscope photograph of fibrous, radiating caffeine crystals glowing white against a black background

Fibrous caffeine crystals photographed under a dark-field microscope. Crystals extending radially from a nucleation point can be observed.

Shown: Not applicable (crystals of a compound, not an organism)Part / state: Crystals (dark-field microscope image)

Photo: Zephyris / CC BY-SA 3.0 / original image / ledger's original image

Scope and provenance of the photo

Identification: Identified as labelled in the source. A photograph of actual crystals taken with a dark-field microscope, not a molecular structure diagram.

Image shown: Resized by NIGAMI LAB to 2400 px on the long side with sips (the original is 7362x4476 px). No trimming or color changes. For display, a WebP capped at 1200 px wide is served; the ledger's original image can be checked from the link above.

On this page (9 sections)
  1. Overview
  2. Sources for this overview (7)
  3. Topic hubs
  4. Follow the connections
  5. Related entries (10)
  6. Measured values (1)
  7. Composition and content (8)
  8. Sensory (13)
  9. Mechanism and receptors (8)
↑

Reading the bitterness

Caffeine is not suitable as a universal representative for use in bitter research. According to reviews, caffeine acts through multiple pathways independent of TAS2R receptors. These include micromolar affinity for adenosine receptors A1, A2A, and A2B; elevation of intracellular calcium via ryanodine receptors; elevation of cGMP through phosphodiesterase inhibition; and TRPA1 channel activity that reverses by species. In mice, TRPA1 is activated by 0.1-10 mM caffeine, and wild-type mice avoided 5 mM caffeine water while TRPA1-deficient mice did not. Conversely, human TRPA1 does not respond to 5 mM caffeine and has been shown to instead suppress its activity.

On the receptor side of caffeine bitterness on the tongue, no simple one-to-one correspondence exists. In cultured-cell receptor assays, caffeine is reported to activate 5 receptors: hTAS2R7, 10, 14, 43, and 46. However, individuals who completely lack the TAS2R43 gene are common in many populations; in a study of 946 individuals from 52 populations worldwide, the deletion allele frequency for this gene was 0.33, and over 20% of subjects in Europe lacked it. Despite this, caffeine bitterness is still perceived. The loss of a single receptor does not erase the bitter sensation itself.

There is individual variation in how bitter caffeine tastes, and this difference is linked to daily intake quantity. In a 20-person study, bitterness ratings for 8 mM caffeine correlated with both the combined mRNA of TAS2R10, 43, and 46 genes in taste buds and daily caffeine intake; these 2 factors explained 47% of the variance in bitterness ratings. In a larger UK population study, individuals genetically predicted to have 1 standard deviation higher caffeine bitterness sensitivity consumed approximately 0.146 cups/day more coffee—a relationship opposite to intuition has been reported. In the same study, bitterness sensitivity to quinine showed the opposite, a negative relationship with coffee intake; only caffeine points in the opposite direction.

This opposite relationship is explained by connecting it to the hypothesis that caffeine bitterness may be 「学習によって好きになる」 (in translation: "acquired through learning"). In a series of experiments with moderate caffeine consumers, after 1 night of caffeine abstinence, a new-flavor beverage was repeatedly paired with caffeine; preference for that flavor increased over successive days. However, this preference did not appear when tested in the non-abstinent state, declined as consumption continued without caffeine, and actually decreased in individuals who had completely abstained for weeks. The researchers explain this phenomenon not as preference for bitterness itself, but as negative reinforcement through relief of caffeine withdrawal discomfort.

Sources for this overview

  1. The Taste of Caffeine

    Poole RL; Tordoff MG / 2017 / review / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed that caffeine acts through multiple receptor-independent pathways / Confirmed the number of 5 receptors activated by caffeine

  2. Caffeine activates mouse TRPA1 channels but suppresses human TRPA1 channels

    Nagatomo K; Kubo Y / 2008 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed experimental results showing species-dependent reversal of TRPA1 activation and suppression

  3. Copy Number Variation in TAS2R Bitter Taste Receptor Genes: Structure, Origin, and Population Genetics

    Roudnitzky N; Risso D; Drayna D; Behrens M; Meyerhof W; Wooding SP / 2016 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed TAS2R43 deletion frequency of 0.33 and over 20% in Europe

  4. Caffeine Bitterness is Related to Daily Caffeine Intake and Bitter Receptor mRNA Abundance in Human Taste Tissue

    Lipchock SV; Spielman AI; Mennella JA; Mansfield CJ; Hwang LD; Douglas JE; Reed DR / 2017 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed result that the correlation between bitterness rating and intake quantity and mRNA amount explains 47%

  5. Understanding the role of bitter taste perception in coffee, tea and alcohol consumption through Mendelian randomization

    Ong JS; Hwang LD; Zhong VW; An J; Gharahkhani P; Breslin PAS; Wright MJ; Lawlor DA; Whitfield J; MacGregor S; Martin NG; Cornelis MC / 2018 / journal article / full text checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed the 0.146 association where higher bitterness sensitivity correlates with increased intake

  6. Acquisition and extinction of flavour preferences conditioned by caffeine in humans

    Yeomans MR; Jackson A; Lee MD; Steer B; Tinley E; Durlach P; Rogers PJ / 2000 / journal article / abstract checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed experiment where flavor conditioning after caffeine abstinence raised preference / Confirmed result showing conditioning preference disappears in the non-deprived state

  7. Caffeine reinforces flavour preference in caffeine-dependent, but not long-term withdrawn, caffeine consumers

    Tinley EM; Yeomans MR; Durlach PJ / 2003 / journal article / abstract checked

    Checked for this overview: Confirmed result showing long-term complete abstainers have decreased liking for caffeinated beverages

Follow the connections

caffeine →is a poor universal prototy…→ bitterness →can be measured separately …→ astringency

caffeine →activates→ human TAS2R receptor family

caffeine →remains bitter even for peo…→ TAS2R43

caffeine →can decrease→ astringency →is not synonymous with→ bitterness

Measured values (1)

KindCompoundTargetValueConditionsSource
receptor EC50caffeineMouse TRPA11–2.5 mMHeterologous expression system (mouse receptors) (Human TRPA1 shows no activation but suppression (species difference))Nagatomo K, 2008

Values are the reported values of each source (with units and conditions). Thresholds and EC50 depend on the panel and method; they are not single true values.

Structured claims — open a section to read each claim's confidence, evidence and limits

Composition and content (8)

coffee brew has bitter contributors other than caffeinesupported

Scope: Multiple lines of evidence: human sensory testing, receptor assays, and quantitative chemistry

Note: A group of counterexamples to the common belief that 「コーヒーの苦味=カフェイン」 (in translation: "coffee's bitterness equals caffeine"). The quantitative contribution ratio is not recorded, since the full text was not confirmed.

Roasting-generated compounds other than caffeine (quinides, 4VC oligomers) define the bitterness quality, and the bitterness signature can be controlled through roasting/extraction conditions.
Limitations: Only the abstract was checked.
Suggests that the group of roasting-degradation products of mozambioside contributes to coffee's bitterness profile.
Limitations: Only the abstract was checked.
Source: Contribution of mozambioside roasting products to coffee's bitter taste (Bichlmaier C; Froehlich SM; Brychcy V; Grassl A; Behrens M; Lang R, 2025) · abstract checked
Context: Given that caffeine itself is not a suitable representative of bitterness, coffee's bitterness cannot be reduced to caffeine alone.
Limitations: This is not direct contribution-ratio data.
Source: The Taste of Caffeine (Poole RL; Tordoff MG, 2017) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-coffee-brew —has_bitter_contributors_other_than→ compound-caffeine
claim: clm-coffee-bitter-beyond-caffeine / type: composition / updated: 2026-08-30
kola nut contains caffeinesupported

Scope: The source lists 「コーラナッツの2つの重要成分」 (in translation: "two important constituents of kola nuts") as caffeine and theobromine

Note: Content values are not reported in the abstract.

The source describes caffeine and theobromine as 2 important constituents of kola nuts.
Limitations: Content values are not reported in the abstract.
Source: Safety assessment of kola nut extract as a food ingredient (Burdock GA; Carabin IG; Crincoli CM, 2009) · abstract checked
Show dataingredient-kola-nut —contains→ compound-caffeine
claim: clm-kola-caffeine / type: composition / updated: 2026-08-31
yerba mate infusion contains caffeinesupported

Scope: Hot- and cold-brewed mate tea infusions

Note: The object_entity is caffeine. Theobromine and theophylline are recorded in object_text.

Lists caffeine, theobromine, and theophylline as the purine alkaloids of the infusion, and states in the background section that mate tea's caffeine content is close to that of coffee.
Limitations: The comparison with coffee is a background statement, not a parallel measurement under the same conditions.
Source: Antioxidant Capacity, Phenolic Compounds, and Other Constituents of Cold and Hot Yerba Mate (Ilex paraguariensis) Infusions (Płatkiewicz J; Okołowicz A; Frankowski R; Grześkowiak T; Jeszka-Skowron M; Zgoła-Grześkowiak A, 2024) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-yerba-mate-infusion —contains→ compound-caffeine
claim: clm-mate-purine-alkaloids / type: composition / updated: 2026-08-31
Doi Chaang Coffee — composition: caffeinecontextual

Scope: Product definition description in the GI registry

Note: This is a description from the GI standard, not based on standardized analytical testing.

『“Doi Chaang Coffee” is coffee...that contains less caffeine (less than 1.1% in raw beans) compared to general coffees...The high elevations result in low caffeine content in the raw coffee beans, as the caffeine content is highly related to elevation.』
Limitations: This is a description from the standard, not measured values from standardized analytical testing. Testing method and sample size are not reported.
Source: Doi Chaang Coffee (2023) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-doi-chang-coffee —has_composition→ compound-caffeine
claim: clm-doichang-caffeine-spec / type: composition / updated: 2026-09-01
hojicha roasting reduces caffeinesupported

Scope: Kochi Prefectural Agricultural Technology Center Tea Experiment Station, 2014; light-roast and deep-roast hojicha made from crude first-flush and cut-leaf tea (roasted 2 times with an automatic continuous hojicha roaster).

Note: Direct quantification by HPLC (Shimadzu).

At light roast, caffeine content shows almost no decrease, but at deep roast it decreased by 6-13%.
Limitations: 1 sample analyzed per condition; the number of replicates is not stated.
Source: 焙煎程度とほうじ茶の品質 (高知県農業技術センター茶業試験場) · full text checked
Show dataprocess-hojicha-roasting —reduces→ compound-caffeine
claim: clm-hojicha-caffeine-decrease-degree / type: composition / updated: 2026-09-02
tea shading cultivation increases caffeinesupported

Scope: New shoots of tea plants -- such as for gyokuro and tencha -- grown under high-shading-rate materials for roughly 20-30 days

Note: A re-investigation of an item deferred in W44 (shading cultivation, "astringency only"). The existing claim covered only the change in catechins (astringent, bitter-astringent compounds) and did not state bitterness explicitly. This claim records that, within the same table of the same manual, the increase in caffeine is classified in the remarks column as "bitterness / functional," while the decrease in catechins is classified as "bitter-astringent compounds" -- a separate item -- showing that the source explicitly distinguishes bitterness from bitter-astringency (astringency).

With shading (covering), caffeine in the new shoots increases and is classified in the remarks column as a "bitterness / functional" component. In the same table, catechins decrease and are classified as "bitter-astringent, functional" -- distinguishing bitterness (caffeine) from bitter-astringency (catechins) as separate items within the table.
Limitations: This is a summary table from a manual; the sensory evaluation method and analytical conditions of the original papers cannot be traced from this source. The primary research underlying the "bitterness" / "bitter-astringency" classification is not identified in the text.
Source: 被覆茶安定生産マニュアル (農食研究推進事業27015Cコンソーシアム(「実需者需要に応える簡易な樹体診断法と効率的被覆作業による高品位安定生産技術の確立」研究チーム), 2018) · full text checked
Show dataprocess-tea-shading-cultivation —increases→ compound-caffeine
claim: clm-w52-shading-caffeine-bitter / type: composition / updated: 2026-09-03
robusta coffee — composition: caffeinesupported

Scope: Layer: food (roasted beans, dry-matter-basis values). HPLC analysis. The 6 samples were 4 arabica (Mexico and Colombia, both decaffeinated, plus Brazil and Costa Rica) and 2 robusta (Guatemala and Brazil), 1 bean each. Not an exhaustive comparison by species.

Among 6 roasted coffee samples, Brazilian robusta (RC_6) had the highest caffeine content at 22.38 mg/g (dry-matter basis). The same bean also had the highest values for 3-CQA (14.09), 4-CQA (8.23), and 5-CQA (4.65 mg/g, dry-matter basis). "Robusta beans were characterized by higher content of all determined bioactive parameters."
Limitations: Per Table 1, the 6 samples were 4 arabica and 2 robusta (RC_5 Guatemala, RC_6 Brazil). Values are for one bean each, not an exhaustive comparison by species.
Source: Antioxidant and Sensory Assessment of Innovative Coffee Blends of Reduced Caffeine Content (Šeremet D; Fabečić P; Vojvodić Cebin A; Mandura Jarić A; Pudić R; Komes D, 2022) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-robusta-coffee —has_composition→ compound-caffeine
claim: clm-w70a-robusta-brazil-highest-caffeine-cga / type: composition / updated: 2026-10-20
yerba mate tree — composition: caffeinepreliminary

Scope: Layer: Literature (review summary). Includes variation by extraction conditions, origin, and processing method.

"These compounds are responsible for the beverage's stimulant and thermogenic effects, as well as its characteristic bitterness. For context, yerba mate typically contains about 78-196 mg of caffeine per 500 mL serving, depending on preparation, which is generally lower than a standard 240 mL cup of filtered coffee, which contains about 95-200 mg."
Limitations: Detailed sources for the variation by extraction conditions, origin, and processing method are not specified in that section.
Source: Bioactive Compounds of Ilex paraguariensis: A Critical Update on Extraction, Gastrointestinal Stability, and Technological Applications (Palavicini SMS; Puton BMS; Jacques RA; Valduga E; Backes GT; Paroul N; Steffens C; Cansian RL, 2025) · full text checked
Show dataorganism-ilex-paraguariensis —has_composition→ compound-caffeine
claim: clm-w71e1-mate-caffeine-content-bitterness / type: composition / updated: 2026-09-07

Sensory (13)

caffeine — perceived bitterness is associated with: Habitual caffeine intake and bitter-receptor mRNA abundance in taste papillaesupported

Scope: A small-scale human study reported in the cited paper

Note: The association does not establish the direction of causation, nor can it be generalized to every population.

n=20. gLMS bitterness ratings of 8 mM caffeine were associated with combined TAS2R10/43/46 mRNA abundance (r(18)=0.47) and with habitual intake (t(18)=2.78, p=.012), with the 2 factors together explaining 47% of the variance in ratings. TAS2R43 alone also showed r(18)=0.54, p=.014. No comparable association was seen for quinine.
Limitations: A cross-sectional study of n=20. Receptor genotypes other than TAS2R38 were not controlled for. The direction of the association (whether habitual drinkers feel it more or less strongly) is not stated explicitly in the text, and the discussion notes that prior intake-manipulation studies have reported inconsistent results.
Source: Caffeine Bitterness is Related to Daily Caffeine Intake and Bitter Receptor mRNA Abundance in Human Taste Tissue (Lipchock SV; Spielman AI; Mennella JA; Mansfield CJ; Hwang LD; Douglas JE; Reed DR, 2017) · full text checked
Context: In large-scale genetic epidemiology too, people with higher genetic sensitivity to caffeine bitterness drink more coffee (+0.146 cups/day per SD) — consistent with the direction of 「常飲と感受性の関連」 (in translation: "the association between habitual drinking and sensitivity"), and interpreted as learned positive reinforcement.
Limitations: Intake is self-reported. The causal path from sensitivity to intake is not a direct measurement of a learning mechanism.
Source: Understanding the role of bitter taste perception in coffee, tea and alcohol consumption through Mendelian randomization (Ong JS; Hwang LD; Zhong VW; An J; Gharahkhani P; Breslin PAS; Wright MJ; Lawlor DA; Whitfield J; MacGregor S; Martin NG; Cornelis MC, 2018) · full text checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —has_perceived_bitterness_associated_with→ (the claim sentence above)
claim: clm-caffeine-individual-differences / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30
flavonol glycosidescaffeine amplifies the bitterness of supported

Scope: Reconstituted black tea infusion system. First empirical demonstration reported

Note: The direction is amplification of caffeine bitterness by flavonol-3-glycosides. This differs in both compound pair and attribute from the finding that caffeine weakens EGCG astringency.

Additional sensory research showed that flavonol-3-glycosides not only impart a velvety astringent sensation but also amplify caffeine bitterness, thereby contributing to the bitterness of tea infusions for the first time.
Limitations: The magnitude of amplification is not shown in the abstract.
Show datacompound-flavonol-glycosides —amplify_bitterness_of→ compound-caffeine
claim: clm-flavonol-glycosides-amplify-caffeine-bitterness / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30
caffeine — perceived bitterness is positively associated with: Coffee intake: +0.146 [0.103, 0.189] cups/day per 1 SD of genetically predicted caffeine bitterness. OR 1.207 [1.126, 1.294] for becoming a consumer of more than 4 cups/day. Tea intake moves in the opposite direction (-0.045 [-0.061, -0.030])supported

Scope: Mendelian randomization, UK Biobank white British ancestry, n = 438,870. The instrumental variable was estimated in an adolescent twin sample, n = 1757

Verbatim confirmed: 'A standard deviation (SD) higher in genetically predicted bitterness of caffeine was associated with increased coffee intake (0.146 [95%CI: 0.103, 0.189] cups/day)'. The authors propose that 'coffee consumers acquire a taste for (or an ability to detect) caffeine given the learned positive reinforcement (i.e. stimulation) elicited by caffeine'.
Limitations: Limitations noted by the authors themselves: the instrumental-variable discovery sample is small (n = 1757), a single-SNP instrument prevents multi-SNP sensitivity analysis, self-reported beverage data, and no generalization to non-European populations.
Source: Understanding the role of bitter taste perception in coffee, tea and alcohol consumption through Mendelian randomization (Ong JS; Hwang LD; Zhong VW; An J; Gharahkhani P; Breslin PAS; Wright MJ; Lawlor DA; Whitfield J; MacGregor S; Martin NG; Cornelis MC, 2018) · full text checked
Verbatim confirmed: "The caffeine-taste sensitive TAS2R14 alleles were nominally associated with higher liking for coffee and intake of caffeinated coffee, regardless its preparation type" — genetic variants for caffeine-bitterness sensitivity point in the same direction as higher coffee liking and intake, consistent with Ong 2018's +0.146 cups/day. The quinine-sensitivity variant (rs10772420 A) instead shows lower coffee intake (β=-0.02) and higher tea intake (β=0.03), also consistent with Ong 2018's 「紅茶は逆方向」 (in translation: "tea moves in the opposite direction"). The overview states "genetically inferred caffeine sensitivity was more strongly associated with coffee taste preferences than with genetically inferred bitter taste perception", also showing a hierarchy in which physiological caffeine sensitivity dominates over bitter perception.
Limitations: PMC8669025 full text confirmed. The TAS2R14 association is nominal (a level that does not pass multiple-testing correction), and in the US cohorts there is no significant association with coffee intake (only dark chocolate is nominal). Since the cohort is the same UK Biobank as Ong 2018 and the author (Cornelis) overlaps, this is not an independent replication but 「同方向の別解析」 (in translation: "a separate analysis pointing the same direction").
Source: Genetic determinants of liking and intake of coffee and other bitter foods and beverages (Cornelis MC; van Dam RM, 2021) · full text checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —has_perceived_bitterness_positively_associated_with→ (the claim sentence above)
claim: clm-caffeine-bitterness-predicts-higher-coffee / type: sensory / updated: 2026-08-30
caffeine contributes to bitternesspreliminary

Scope: Layer: literature (secondhand citation). A figure stated in the Introduction of Gigl et al. 2026 (JAFC, full text read), citing Chen W.C. (1979, a doctoral dissertation at the University of Munich, primary source not read — a secondhand citation).

"investigations performed by Chen revealed that the alkaloids caffeine and trigonelline, already present in raw coffee beans, contribute to a maximum of 10–30 and 1%, respectively, to the overall bitterness of a coffee beverage." "No other bitter compound in coffee has been identified that shows a concentration that exceeds its threshold value so drastically, and for this reason, caffeine should play an important role in the overall bitter taste of coffee beverages." (Introduction; 10–30% is the value for caffeine and 1% for trigonelline.)
Limitations: The primary source (Chen 1979) is a secondhand citation whose original has not been read.
Source: Impact of Interactions between Melanoidins and Caffeine on the Bitter Taste of Coffee Beverages (Gigl M; Kreissl J; Frank O, 2026) · full text checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —contributes_to→ sensation-bitter
claim: clm-w70a-chen-caffeine-bitterness-ceiling / type: sensory / updated: 2026-10-06
coffee brew — perceived bitterness is unchanged by: caffeinesupported

Scope: Layer: food. Sensory evaluation on a 5-point scale, 0 (not detectable) to 5 (strongly detected), by 18 panelists (8 women, 10 men, ages 23-31). Caffeine was added to a decaffeinated roasted coffee beverage (a commercial capsule, equivalent to 54 g/L).

"Surprisingly, there was no significant difference in the bitter taste between the decaffeinated sample (3.8) and the sample...where caffeine was added with a value...of 4.0"
Limitations: Limited to a single commercial decaffeinated product (an arabica blend, espresso strength 6/12).
Source: Impact of Interactions between Melanoidins and Caffeine on the Bitter Taste of Coffee Beverages (Gigl M; Kreissl J; Frank O, 2026) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-coffee-brew —has_perceived_bitterness_unchanged_by→ compound-caffeine
claim: clm-w70a-decaf-roast-caffeine-added-no-bitterness-increase / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07
caffeine can increase bitternesssupported

Scope: Layer: food. A 3-AFC method in which panelists identified 1 added-caffeine cup among 3 cups, 2 of which were decaffeinated coffee (control).

"Only at a caffeine concentration of 12.5 mmol/L, which does not occur naturally in coffee beverages, were the panelists able to perceive the added caffeine due to its typical unpleasant bitterness and the significant (p ≤ 0.05) increase in bitter intensity."
Limitations: Limited to a single commercial decaffeinated product.
Source: Impact of Interactions between Melanoidins and Caffeine on the Bitter Taste of Coffee Beverages (Gigl M; Kreissl J; Frank O, 2026) · full text checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —can_increase→ sensation-bitter
claim: clm-w70a-caffeine-breakthrough-concentration-3afc / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07
melanoidins reduces the perceived bitterness of caffeinesupported

Scope: Layer: food (reconstitution of a high-molecular-weight fraction isolated from coffee). A 5-point scale, 0 (not detectable) to 5 (strongly detected), 18 panelists, t-test (α=0.05).

Relative to the caffeine (7.5 mmol/L) reference = 5.0 (ref), caffeine+5-CQA+HMW>10kDa (at the original extraction concentration) = 2.5 (±0.3), p≤0.05.
Limitations: Limited to the HMW fraction derived from a single commercial coffee product (Dallmayr Capsa Espresso Decaffeinato).
Source: Impact of Interactions between Melanoidins and Caffeine on the Bitter Taste of Coffee Beverages (Gigl M; Kreissl J; Frank O, 2026) · full text checked
Show datacompound-class-melanoidins —reduces_perceived_bitterness_of→ compound-caffeine
claim: clm-w70a-melanoidin-halves-caffeine-bitterness / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07
caffeine — perceived bitterness is unchanged by: chlorogenic acidsupported

Scope: Layer: solution. 18 panelists, 0-5 point scale, t-test (α=0.05).

"No significant difference in bitter taste perception could be observed between the reference caffeine solution (intensity 5.0) and the equimolar caffeine-chlorogenic acid complex 4.8 (±0.2)."
Limitations: A result from a single molar ratio (equimolar).
Source: Impact of Interactions between Melanoidins and Caffeine on the Bitter Taste of Coffee Beverages (Gigl M; Kreissl J; Frank O, 2026) · full text checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —has_perceived_bitterness_unchanged_by→ compound-chlorogenic-acid
claim: clm-w70a-cqa-caffeine-complex-no-bitterness-effect / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07
caffeine — bitter recognition threshold: The human caffeine bitter detection threshold is cited as 0.67 mmol/Lpreliminary

Scope: Layer: Literature (cited value). The value cited in the text of Gigl et al. 2026 (JAFC) (original source not specified)

Note: An indirect citation whose original source is not specified in the text

"the concentration of the caffeine was more than factor 10 above its bitter detection threshold (0.67 mmol/L)"
Limitations: Gigl et al. 2026 text does not specify the source of this value; the origin remains unidentified.
Source: Impact of Interactions between Melanoidins and Caffeine on the Bitter Taste of Coffee Beverages (Gigl M; Kreissl J; Frank O, 2026) · full text checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —has_bitter_recognition_threshold→ (the claim sentence above)
claim: clm-w70a-caffeine-bitter-threshold-value / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07
coffee brew — perceived bitterness is affected by: caffeinepreliminary

Scope: Layer: Food. QDA by a trained panel of 18 and consumer preference survey of 120. Traditional and decaffeinated espresso sweetened with sucrose, sucralose, or stevia (multiple rebaudioside A concentrations) were compared.

Regular espressos scored higher than decaffeinated ones for bitterness and other attributes. Decaffeinated samples had lower pH (5.24–5.28 vs 5.40–5.43). In Table 3, sensory acidity was higher on average for regular espresso in all 5 pairs (for example 4.93 vs 3.78), which conflicts with the abstract and conclusions stating that decaffeinated espresso was more acidic.
Limitations: Acidity runs in opposite directions in the table and in the abstract and conclusions, so it cannot be settled.
Source: Between Bitterness and Sweetness: How Decaffeination and Sweeteners Shape the Sensory Experience of Espresso Coffee (Cusielo KVC; Medeiros AC; Hiramatsu EY; Bolini HMA, 2026) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-coffee-brew —has_perceived_bitterness_affected_by→ compound-caffeine
claim: clm-w70a-decaf-espresso-lower-bitterness / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07
green coffee bean — perceived bitterness is unchanged by: caffeinesupported

Scope: Layer: food. A raw coffee beverage prepared at 54 g/L unroasted coffee powder from green beans (Colombian origin, ground under liquid nitrogen). 18 panelists, 0-5 point scale.

"low intensities for sweet (0.5), sour (1.25), and astringency (1.0), no significant bitter taste was detectable, although the concentration of the caffeine was more than factor 10 above its bitter detection threshold (0.67 mmol/L)"
Limitations: Limited to 1 lot of green beans from a single origin. The bitterness value of the raw coffee beverage itself without caffeine added is not shown in the figure (only the value after addition).
Source: Impact of Interactions between Melanoidins and Caffeine on the Bitter Taste of Coffee Beverages (Gigl M; Kreissl J; Frank O, 2026) · full text checked
Show dataingredient-green-coffee-bean —has_perceived_bitterness_unchanged_by→ compound-caffeine
claim: clm-w70a-raw-coffee-no-bitterness-despite-caffeine / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07
L-arginine increases caffeinesupported

Scope: Layer: Solution. Labeled Magnitude Scale (LMS) bitterness intensity rating by 45 healthy adults (separate from the PROP experiment mentioned above).

"Supplementation with L-Arg (1:1 caffeine:L-Arg molar ratio) significantly increased caffeine bitterness intensity (F[1,40] = 15.625; p = 0.00031; repeated measures ANOVA)...All solutions containing only L-Arg did not evoke any taste perception in all subjects (data not shown)."
Limitations: The effect on caffeine bitterness was examined under only 1 condition (1.5 mM, equimolar addition).
Source: Dose-Dependent Effects of L-Arginine on PROP Bitterness Intensity and Latency and Characteristics of the Chemical Interaction between PROP and L-Arginine (Melis M; Arca M; Aragoni MC; Cabras T; Caltagirone C; Castagnola M; Crnjar R; Messana I; Tepper BJ; Tomassini Barbarossa I, 2015) · full text checked
Show datacompound-arginine —increases→ compound-caffeine
claim: clm-w71a2-arginine-increases-caffeine-bitterness / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-07
caffeine — perceived bitterness is suppressed by: Addition of 0.03% or higher acetic acid aqueous solutionsupported

Scope: Ranking method sensory test (20 female students, Hamajima 1981) in a model system where caffeine (0.03/0.05%, etc.) was stepwise added to acetic acid aqueous solution (0.01/0.1/0.3/0.5%)

Note: This is basic knowledge of taste interactions in an aqueous model system, not an experiment targeting specific foods like ornamental chrysanthemum. In the actual preparation of edible chrysanthemum, the materials we checked (FoodsLink, note.com) explain the purpose of adding vinegar as color development, not as bitterness suppression. Do not casually conflate the two.

「酸の0.03%以上の添加により苦味は減少している」(in translation: "bitterness decreases with addition of 0.03% or higher acid"); in a ranking method test of 0.03% caffeine solution with 0.01-0.1% acetic acid addition, 20/20 subjects who perceived strong bitterness without addition perceived 0/20 strong bitter taste and 20/20 perceived strong acidity when 0.1% acetic acid was added (Tables 6-1 and 6-2). Similar descriptions appear for 0.05% caffeine solution (Tables 7-1 and 7-2).
Limitations: This is an experiment in an aqueous model system and has not been applied to specific foods like edible chrysanthemum. A single study from 1981.
Source: 味の相互関係について(第6報)酸味と苦味の関係 (浜島教子, 1981) · full text checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —has_perceived_bitterness_suppressed_by→ (the claim sentence above)
claim: clm-aprep-acetic-acid-suppresses-caffeine-bitterness / type: sensory / updated: 2026-09-13

Mechanism and receptors (8)

caffeine is a poor universal prototype for bitternesssupported

Scope: Caffeine's experimental use as a bitter stimulus

Note: The review in question also discusses receptor-independent pathways in addition to the canonical pathway.

Caffeine acts through multiple TAS2R-independent pathways: µM affinity at adenosine receptors A1/A2A/A2B (taste cells express A2B), a rise in intracellular Ca via ryanodine receptors, ITPR3 inhibition, a rise in cGMP via PDE inhibition, and TRPA1 — activated in mice but inhibited in humans (a species difference). The conclusion is that caffeine should not be regarded as a prototypical bitter substance.
Limitations: A review. States explicitly that knockdown confirmation of action via endogenous T2Rs in taste cells has not been carried out. The receptors are not conserved across species, and the mechanism is species-dependent.
Source: The Taste of Caffeine (Poole RL; Tordoff MG, 2017) · full text checked
Caffeine (0.1–10 mM) activates mouse TRPA1 (the EC50 is stated in the text as between 1 and 2.5 mM), while human TRPA1 responded to 100 uM AITC but not to 5 mM caffeine, and its current was suppressed under chase application in the presence of AITC. 8 WT mice avoided 5 mM caffeine water (P = 0.012), but 10 TRPA1-KO mice did not avoid it (P = 0.096). Of 63 capsaicin-responsive DRG neurons in WT, 20 responded to both caffeine and AITC, versus 0 of 115 in KO. The abstract closes by stating that caffeine does not activate human TRPA1 and instead suppresses its activity. This is primary-level evidence that the receptor pathway for caffeine's response is not conserved across species, supporting the claim that caffeine cannot be treated as a universal bitter prototype.
Limitations: The perceptual consequence of human TRPA1 suppression (how it feels to humans) has not been tested. The authors themselves discuss human caffeine bitterness as proceeding via T2R, so this study demonstrates a species difference in a non-T2R pathway, not a replacement of the whole taste pathway. The authors state that the KO could not be used as a negative control for immunostaining.
Source: Caffeine activates mouse TRPA1 channels but suppresses human TRPA1 channels (Nagatomo K; Kubo Y, 2008) · full text checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —is_a_poor_universal_prototype_for→ sensation-bitter
claim: clm-caffeine-not-prototype / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-08-30
caffeine activates human TAS2R receptor familysupported

Scope: A receptor assay in a cultured-cell system (Meyerhof et al.'s results as cited by a review)

Note: EC50 is not given in the review.

In Meyerhof et al.'s cell assay, caffeine activated 5 receptors: hTAS2R7/10/14/43/46.
Limitations: Via a review. No concentration information such as EC50. The primary paper (Meyerhof 2010) is not included.
Source: The Taste of Caffeine (Poole RL; Tordoff MG, 2017) · full text checked
The abstract of an independent functional calcium-imaging study explicitly states, as background, that caffeine activates 5 human bitter taste receptors (a restatement of the Meyerhof-lineage finding). In that study's own assay as well, TAS2R43/46 responded to caffeine (less sensitively than to mozambioside). This shows that the attribution of 5 receptors was still maintained as a premise in the research community as of 2020.
Limitations: The names of the 5 receptors (TAS2R7/10/14/43/46) are not listed in the abstract. The primary data are Meyerhof 2010 (the related record; full text not reached), and this row remains a restatement plus partial (TAS2R43/46) direct confirmation. The author list includes Behrens and is not independent of the Meyerhof lineage.
Source: Numerous Compounds Orchestrate Coffee's Bitterness (Lang T; Lang R; Di Pizio A; Mittermeier VK; Schlagbauer V; Hofmann T; Behrens M, 2020) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —activates→ receptor-tas2r-family
claim: clm-caffeine-activates-five-tas2rs / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-08-30
caffeine remains bitter even for people lacking TAS2R43supported

Scope: The correspondence between the frequency of the gene deletion in human populations and perception

Note: An example that a single receptor cannot explain bitterness perception. "About 18-30%" is a review-level figure. Note that the primary data (946 people / 52 populations) give a deletion-allele frequency of 0.33, a different kind of quantity from "the proportion of individuals lacking the gene".

About 18-30% of the population lacks the TAS2R43 gene, yet caffeine's bitterness is perceived.
Limitations: Via a review. The primary source for the deletion frequency is not included.
Source: The Taste of Caffeine (Poole RL; Tordoff MG, 2017) · full text checked
Context: Gives the population-genetic basis underlying this claim from primary data rather than via a review: in 946 subjects from 52 populations worldwide, copy number for both TAS2R43 and TAS2R45 ranged from 0 to 2, and the 43delta and 45delta deletions occurred at high frequency worldwide (0.33 and 0.18). The TAS2R43 deletion spans 37.8 kb, including the entire coding region, and the paper states that in Europe more than 20% of subjects lacked this gene. No signal of natural selection was found, and the authors attribute this pattern to genetic drift.
Limitations: What this study measures is gene copy number, not caffeine perception, so the study itself does not show that caffeine remains bitter in the absence of TAS2R43. It also refines the figure carried over by the review: the reported quantity is a deletion-allele frequency of 0.33, which is not the same as the proportion of people lacking the gene; the paper gives a regional figure for Europe (more than 20%) rather than a single worldwide percentage. The 18-30% range recorded from Poole 2017 should therefore be treated as a review-level approximation.
Source: Copy Number Variation in TAS2R Bitter Taste Receptor Genes: Structure, Origin, and Population Genetics (Roudnitzky N; Risso D; Drayna D; Behrens M; Meyerhof W; Wooding SP, 2016) · full text checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —remains_bitter_despite_absence_of→ receptor-tas2r43
claim: clm-tas2r43-absent-still-bitter / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-08-30
caffeine can decrease astringencypreliminary

Scope: In an EGCG/caffeine/saliva model, the astringency of EGCG when caffeine partially occupied EGCG binding sites on salivary proteins

Note: Assessed by molecular docking, ITC, and salivary rheology. Perceived astringency was inferred from salivary film structure; the abstract reports no human panel data.

Caffeine partially occupied EGCG binding sites on salivary proteins, inhibited EGCG-salivary protein interactions, altered the elastic network structure of the salivary film, and thereby reduced astringency.
Limitations: Astringency reduction was inferred from physicochemical endpoints. The abstract reports no human sensory panel data.
Source: Caffeine weakens the astringency of epigallocatechin gallate by inhibiting its interaction with salivary proteins (Zhou Z; Ou M; Shen W; Jin W; Yang G; Huang W; Guo C, 2024) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —can_decrease→ sensation-astringent
claim: clm-caffeine-weakens-egcg-astringency / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-08-30
caffeine conditions liking for paired flavors: In moderate caffeine consumers who abstained overnight, an increase in liking for a novel beverage flavor repeatedly paired with caffeinesupported

Scope: Double-blind human flavor-conditioning studies (University of Sussex group)

Note: The experimental basis for the 『連合学習』 (in translation: "associative learning") theory of coffee and beer preference. Note that replication remains within the same research group.

Liking for a novel-flavored caffeinated beverage, consumed after 12 hours of caffeine abstinence, increased across 4 days of training in 36 moderate caffeine consumers, and was maintained only in the group that continued to receive caffeine during the abstinence state.
Limitations: Moderate consumers only. Prior research cited in the abstract shows that conditioning does not occur in low consumers. A single research group.
Source: Acquisition and extinction of flavour preferences conditioned by caffeine in humans (Yeomans MR; Jackson A; Lee MD; Steer B; Tinley E; Durlach P; Rogers PJ, 2000) · abstract checked
Comfort/pleasantness ratings of a novel beverage containing 100 mg of caffeine rose over 4 days of testing in consumers who maintained caffeine intake, but fell significantly in consumers who abstained from caffeine for 4 weeks.
Limitations: An abstract-level reading; part of the same Sussex research lineage as Yeomans 2000, and not a fully independent replication.
Using an ecologically valid procedure — overnight caffeine abstinence plus 70 mg at breakfast (equivalent to 1 cup of coffee) — moderate consumers developed a relative dislike for the caffeine-free beverage. Overnight abstinence lowered mood (less lively, less clearheaded and less cheerful), and caffeine significantly improved it. Low consumers showed no significant effect on either preference or mood. The authors conclude that caffeine reinforcement can occur as a result of caffeine alleviating the adverse effects of overnight caffeine abstinence (negative reinforcement). A foundational report using the same-type paradigm preceding Yeomans 2000 and Tinley 2003, also directly showing dependence on consumption history (no conditioning in low consumers).
Limitations: Abstract only confirmed. n and number of training days are not reported in the abstract. The Rogers group at Reading later co-authored Yeomans 2000, so this is not a fully independent lab replication from the Sussex lineage (an earlier report from the same lineage at a different institution).
Source: Overnight caffeine abstinence and negative reinforcement of preference for caffeine-containing drinks (Rogers PJ; Richardson NJ; Elliman NA, 1995) · abstract checked
Context: Circumstantial support from the genetic epidemiology side: shows that variants in caffeine metabolism/sensitivity systems are more strongly linked to coffee taste preference (including presence or absence of milk/sweetener) than variants in the bitter-perception system, and the authors give the same interpretation to population genetic data as laboratory flavor-conditioning studies (citing the Yeomans lineage): "Taste preferences and physiological caffeine effects intertwine in a way that is difficult to distinguish for individuals which may represent conditioned taste preferences".
Limitations: An interpretation from observational genetic data, not a direct test of the conditioning process. A discussion that does not go beyond "may represent".
Source: Genetic determinants of liking and intake of coffee and other bitter foods and beverages (Cornelis MC; van Dam RM, 2021) · full text checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —conditions_liking_for_paired_flavors→ (the claim sentence above)
claim: clm-caffeine-conditions-flavor-liking / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-08-30
caffeine produces conditioned liking that depends on Caffeine deprivation state: the conditioned preference is not expressed when tested in a non-deprived state, is extinguished without caffeine, and reverses in consumers who are fully withdrawnsupported

Scope: The same conditioning paradigm. The 4-week maintenance/withdrawal manipulation in Tinley 2003

Note: Supports the negative reinforcement theory. A strong limitation on the naive interpretation of 『苦味自体を安定的に好きになる』 (in translation: "coming to stably like bitterness itself").

Both groups tested without deprivation showed a marked drop in liking on all 4 test days compared with the last training day, and the deprived group without caffeine showed extinction. The authors conclude that conditioned flavour preferences may not be expressed without the relevant motivational state, caffeine deprivation (abstract).
Limitations: Training is short (4 days). It is the flavor of a novel drink, not coffee itself.
Source: Acquisition and extinction of flavour preferences conditioned by caffeine in humans (Yeomans MR; Jackson A; Lee MD; Steer B; Tinley E; Durlach P; Rogers PJ, 2000) · abstract checked
Giving a novel caffeinated beverage to consumers placed in full withdrawal lowered pleasantness. The authors read this as showing that caffeine's reinforcement of flavor liking 'is driven by the alleviation of withdrawal symptoms among habitual caffeine consumers' (negative reinforcement theory).
Limitations: This does not directly test long-term coffee drinkers' liking for coffee's bitterness. An abstract-level reading.
Shows that the establishment of the conditioned preference itself is explained as 「一晩のカフェイン断ちによる負の状態のカフェインによる緩和」 (in translation: "caffeine's alleviation of the negative state caused by overnight caffeine abstinence") (negative reinforcement), and that low consumers, who do not enter a withdrawal state, show neither a preference change nor a mood effect. A report from a different institution, preceding Tinley 2003's 4-week withdrawal manipulation, showing the core of this claim — that the conditioned preference requires the motivational state of caffeine withdrawal.
Limitations: Abstract only confirmed. The demonstration of the difference in expression from the deprived/non-deprived state manipulation at test is not this study's design but Yeomans 2000's; this report shows state-dependence on the acquisition side.
Source: Overnight caffeine abstinence and negative reinforcement of preference for caffeine-containing drinks (Rogers PJ; Richardson NJ; Elliman NA, 1995) · abstract checked
Context: A double-blind crossover from a lab (Johns Hopkins) fully independent of the Sussex/Reading conditioning lineage. Under about 19 hours of intake restriction, moderate consumers (mean 379 mg/day) showed a choice of forgoing a mean of $2.51 to avoid placebo (i.e., withdrawal), while paying only a mean of $0.38 to reacquire caffeine. Headache intensity correlated significantly with the placebo-avoidance amount. The authors conclude that the choice of caffeine is controlled more strongly by avoiding withdrawal than by the positive effects of caffeine, confirming in a different paradigm (drug choice) that negative reinforcement is the main driver of caffeine reinforcement.
Limitations: Abstract only confirmed. n is not reported in the abstract. Taste/flavor preference was not measured, so this is not a replication of the conditioned preference itself (circumstantial support on the mechanism side). Intake was via capsule, not in a beverage context.
Source: Caffeine reinforcement: the role of withdrawal (Schuh KJ; Griffiths RR, 1997) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —produces_conditioned_liking_dependent_on→ (the claim sentence above)
claim: clm-caffeine-conditioned-liking-state-dependent / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-08-30
caffeine activates TAS2R43preliminary

Scope: Layer: cell. Cell functional experiments using several human bitter taste receptors reported to be caffeine-sensitive (TAS2R7, TAS2R10, TAS2R14, TAS2R43, TAS2R46).

Note: Suess et al. 2018's full text was not reached because of a subscription restriction; confirmed from an OpenAlex abstract restoration (the paper's own abstract, not a secondary citation).

Cell-based functional experiments with the human bitter taste receptors TAS2R7, TAS2R10, TAS2R14, TAS2R43, and TAS2R46, all reported to be sensitive to caffeine, showed that (R)-citronellal completely blocked caffeine-induced calcium signals in TAS2R43-expressing cells. Stimulating TAS2R43-expressing cells with structurally different bitter agonists identified (R)-citronellal as a general allosteric inhibitor of TAS2R43.
Limitations: Full text not read; only the abstract-level description. Specific figures such as dose or IC50 are not given in the abstract.
Source: The Odorant (R)-Citronellal Attenuates Caffeine Bitterness by Inhibiting the Bitter Receptors TAS2R43 and TAS2R46 (Suess B; Brockhoff A; Meyerhof W; Hofmann T, 2018) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —activates→ receptor-tas2r43
claim: clm-w71g1-tas2r43-caffeine-citronellal / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-09-07
caffeine activates TAS2R46preliminary

Scope: Layer: cell. Cell functional experiments using several human bitter taste receptors reported to be caffeine-sensitive.

Note: Suess et al. 2018's full text was not reached because of a subscription restriction; confirmed from an OpenAlex abstract restoration.

(R)-citronellal was found to completely block caffeine-induced calcium signals in TAS2R43-expressing cells and, to a lesser extent, in TAS2R46-expressing cells.
Limitations: Full text not read; only the abstract-level description. The specific inhibition rate or IC50 behind "lesser extent" is not given in the abstract.
Source: The Odorant (R)-Citronellal Attenuates Caffeine Bitterness by Inhibiting the Bitter Receptors TAS2R43 and TAS2R46 (Suess B; Brockhoff A; Meyerhof W; Hofmann T, 2018) · abstract checked
Show datacompound-caffeine —activates→ receptor-tas2r46
claim: clm-w71g1-tas2r46-caffeine-citronellal / type: mechanism / updated: 2026-09-07

↑ Top of page · ← Encyclopedia (English entries)